Should Saudis run our ports?

All right, now. This, that I have read about, is frankly, absolutely, ridiculous. That Bush should give over control of those six ports to the Saudis is suspect in the first place, although not surprising, since, in my opinion, he has been in the UAE's pocket for years, probably thinking he was in theirs(!) And him claiming that this deal is absolutely not a security concern? When money from the UAE funded the terrorists that came over in 9/11, and two of the terrorists were actually FROM there? Where's your security concern now? The Saudis claiming they don't deal with terrorists anymore, but are completely on the side of the United States, AGAINST terrorists? Come on! We're supposed to believe the wolf in sheep's clothing, huh? Oh, and while I'm at it, about the so-called second-in-command at the Pentagon's statement that anyone publicly opposing this deal are to be considered a threat to the country?!!! What about freedom of speech? Hah? Are we supposed to cower in fear because of that statement? I'm not, in fact it makes me angry. How dare he say that! We should never be afraid to speak our mind in this country, unless it goes into the maniacal, because freedom of speech is one thing our country is based on. And I suppose Bush is also going to say freedom of commerce, since this deal with the Saudis is supposed to bring $6.8 billion dollars; well, that all depends where that money goes, if not just to line the pockets of the Bush administration and all its wealthy friends. I would like to trust that Congress and the Senate and the House make sure that the money gets evenly distributed. But to get back to the security issue: it's said that theDubai Ports World would NOT handle any security, but that they would leave that up to us. All of it. The Coast Guard, etc. Well, since they found ways to sneak the 9/11 terrorists in on us, more to our shame, we were not ready, we were TOO trusting, what's to say they couldn't do it again? Hm? And Mr. Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England said, (quote) "...Terrorists want our nation to become distrustful...paranoid and isolationist. My view is we cannot allow this to happen; it needs to be just the opposite." Oh, well! Wouldn't you rather be distrustful, in regard to a nation like the United Arab Emirate, with its bad rep and track record, than drop all guard and welcome a terrorist-serving country into the United States with open arms, to take control of six of our, as it looks like, most strategic ports?!! Paranoid and isolationist? Ooh, are we taking to namecalling the American people? Mr. England! Remember, "of the people, by the people, and FOR the people"! Not just one man and his rich cronies. You know who I mean. But that's not the main point, the main point is our country's control and continued freedom. Hey, come on in here, folks, and give me your comments!