The Lady Debates

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

"Pot"lollies?!

Children looovve candy; children of all ages love lollipops, including us "biggest kids". Parents love their children, and want to protect them; but what good, as the article goes, are anti-drug campaigns on TV and in school if companies like Chronic Candy and Pot Suckers confuse the issue by selling.....you guessed it: pot-flavored lollipops? Such candy has been highly promoted (unknown as to how well it's selling yet, but you can guess the appeal to the adult market!), and the companies that make them claim their products are only flavored with "hemp essential oil", not containing THC, marijuana's active ingredient, but hold the phone; they also say these products are only intended for ages 18 and over, IF you visit the company store. But yet the pot-flavored lollies and gumdrops ARE available for minors to buy online and at the discretion of the stores that sell them, including Spencer's in Lynnhaven Mall in Virginia Beach, which sells Stoner Pops (!) Go figure. And whether or not the candy does get you high (mayhap only psychologically?), the entire setup is rather unappealing; it smacks of the dope pusher, putting his wares into candy to hook kids to make more money (the bottom line). I mean, what adult who might have or have had kids would be able to suck on one of those lollipops and read Mary Jane Candy Co.'s slogan, "Every Lick is Like Taking a Hit", and think of their own offspring? Whoa, look out, Guilt City; or Shame City, whatever. The sentiment's the same, the dirty old man giving candy to children in order to lead them to a bad end. And the girl who wrote the original article did have a point, when she said that by selling the flavor and image of the drug, the companies were essentially selling weed itself. Even I can see where a curious kid might surreptitiously buy one of these lollipops to try the taste, and then think, Hm. That's pretty good. I wonder what smoking it would actually be like? I mean, teenagers and adults are the same in that respect, plant a seed in their minds, it almost always will grow into something! And that bad ol' Mary Jane Candy Co. even sells its ganja gumdrops in dime and nickel bags, for realism sake---for crying out loud. That's going a little too far. But people aren't letting them get away with nothing: the Georgia legislature, Long Island, are making moves to ban the candy; and in Texas, they almost were able to vote on a bill to make the sale of cannabis confections punishable by a $4,000 fine. Wow! A bit harsh for candy, but not for what it's made out of, and the ramifications of it. Besides, we have some very good anti-drug campaigns going on, one of which received appropriations of $119 million in fiscal year 2005. These drug campaigns are saving young lives, and it's not worth the money spent on them to waste it by promoting marijuana, in a form that appeals to children. Now, I must say here that I have some reservations, for the possibilities of finding avenues of pain relief in marijuana for people with terminal illnesses, but that's about it. I repeat, it's just not worth it: contrary to my old flower child spirit, my older and wiser spirit can now see that if marijuana were legalized in this country, another, enemy country could probably just arrange to get everyone over here stoned, then come in and truly "waste" us.

I welcome your comments.

5 Comments:

  • At 2:11 PM, Blogger Katja R. said…

    I meant to come and say 'hi' things have been busy for me, my manuscript got it's first rejection letter. I'm sort of annoyed but maybe it wasn't something to that particular editor's taste. I haven't had time to mess with it and make it better, she claimed she'd give specific critiques. She said my grammer was bad, and was patronizing about it, but that isn't really as specific as all that. I suspect that many best selling authors do worse than I do in that department!

     
  • At 12:59 PM, Blogger Mistress Editor said…

    Oh, dear Yakima, I don't see why anything you write should get a rejection letter! Except for the particular editor who was too damn particular! And she thought so much of herself that she could give you specific critiques, huh? You're right, a lot of editors are a lot worse on their authors!
    No, how big is your manuscript? I would love to read it, if you're at the stage where you're will for people to see it yet; I promise my critique will not be patronizing, but very gentle, and as honest as I can make it, which hopefully, speaking the truth about myself, is as honest as the day.
    Oh, and what did you think about "pot"lollies?

     
  • At 10:05 AM, Blogger Katja R. said…

    I don't think normal children would actually LIKE the taste! Pot has this sort of burnt straw like taste, it is known that American kids at least, are not nuts about vegetable tastes. I don't think even sugar would make pot taste actually GOOD to a kid.
    I can see having this product for older people with glaucoma, cancer related nausea, AIDS related appetite and weight loss, depressed people who don't trust the standard drugs, but I don't think it ought to be in the candy store! It should be a prescribed delivery system for people who need this drug for other reasons!
    I personally did try pot years ago. It's effect on me was minimal except to make me really paranoid and rather mean. I never get mean if I drink alchol! I personally stick to the legal stuff.
    With my kids, I removed the thrill of 'forbidden fruit' when I talked to them about things like drugs and alchol. I talked first frankly about costs, and how the drug in question is brought to the 'customer', then I talked about the fact that even the lighter end of the drugs are seldom of decent quality for anyone young or poor.
    They knew that if they really wanted a glass of wine or a beer it was ok if they had it AT HOME, just ask me, AFTER home work. Funny thing is they seldom asked for a drink. The kids never took up smoking. I don't smoke myself, but I told them if they felt like trying it, I'd buy them any brand they wanted.
    My reasoning was if they could have a drink at home, good stuff under safe conditions, they would not be going to keggers or having a drink of God knows what all in the school rest room.
    They actually were not all that interested in any of the above. They never tried pot. My daughter tried cigarrettes and decided they were a pointless vice, she likes to drink, but she does so in moderation, and really doesn't like it that much.
    My son doesn't like alchol much and only drinks rarely.
    I think removing the 'forbiden fruit' aspect gives parents more leverage.

     
  • At 10:06 AM, Blogger Katja R. said…

    I don't think normal children would actually LIKE the taste! Pot has this sort of burnt straw like taste, it is known that American kids at least, are not nuts about vegetable tastes. I don't think even sugar would make pot taste actually GOOD to a kid.
    I can see having this product for older people with glaucoma, cancer related nausea, AIDS related appetite and weight loss, depressed people who don't trust the standard drugs, but I don't think it ought to be in the candy store! It should be a prescribed delivery system for people who need this drug for other reasons!
    I personally did try pot years ago. It's effect on me was minimal except to make me really paranoid and rather mean. I never get mean if I drink alchol! I personally stick to the legal stuff.
    With my kids, I removed the thrill of 'forbidden fruit' when I talked to them about things like drugs and alchol. I talked first frankly about costs, and how the drug in question is brought to the 'customer', then I talked about the fact that even the lighter end of the drugs are seldom of decent quality for anyone young or poor.
    They knew that if they really wanted a glass of wine or a beer it was ok if they had it AT HOME, just ask me, AFTER home work. Funny thing is they seldom asked for a drink. The kids never took up smoking. I don't smoke myself, but I told them if they felt like trying it, I'd buy them any brand they wanted.
    My reasoning was if they could have a drink at home, good stuff under safe conditions, they would not be going to keggers or having a drink of God knows what all in the school rest room.
    They actually were not all that interested in any of the above. They never tried pot. My daughter tried cigarrettes and decided they were a pointless vice, she likes to drink, but she does so in moderation, and really doesn't like it that much.
    My son doesn't like alchol much and only drinks rarely.
    I think removing the 'forbiden fruit' aspect gives parents more leverage.

     
  • At 10:08 AM, Blogger Katja R. said…

    I don't think normal children would actually LIKE the taste! Pot has this sort of burnt straw like taste, it is known that American kids at least, are not nuts about vegetable tastes. I don't think even sugar would make pot taste actually GOOD to a kid.
    I can see having this product for older people with glaucoma, cancer related nausea, AIDS related appetite and weight loss, depressed people who don't trust the standard drugs, but I don't think it ought to be in the candy store! It should be a prescribed delivery system for people who need this drug for other reasons!
    I personally did try pot years ago. It's effect on me was minimal except to make me really paranoid and rather mean. I never get mean if I drink alchol! I personally stick to the legal stuff.
    With my kids, I removed the thrill of 'forbidden fruit' when I talked to them about things like drugs and alchol. I talked first frankly about costs, and how the drug in question is brought to the 'customer', then I talked about the fact that even the lighter end of the drugs are seldom of decent quality for anyone young or poor.
    They knew that if they really wanted a glass of wine or a beer it was ok if they had it AT HOME, just ask me, AFTER home work. Funny thing is they seldom asked for a drink. The kids never took up smoking. I don't smoke myself, but I told them if they felt like trying it, I'd buy them any brand they wanted.
    My reasoning was if they could have a drink at home, good stuff under safe conditions, they would not be going to keggers or having a drink of God knows what all in the school rest room.
    They actually were not all that interested in any of the above. They never tried pot. My daughter tried cigarrettes and decided they were a pointless vice, she likes to drink, but she does so in moderation, and really doesn't like it that much.
    My son doesn't like alchol much and only drinks rarely.
    I think removing the 'forbiden fruit' aspect gives parents more leverage.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home